My
recollection of past assessments on writing is not that clear. It has been well
over ten years since I took a college level English class. All the writing that
was assigned in my History courses was primarily graded by content and
organization. More recently I had some writing assignments in my Spanish
classes, but they were always more of a product approach. Normally I just had
one shot at writing about a prompt, and the professors would take off for
content, organization, grammatical errors, and spelling. What little I remember
about the English classes is that they were process oriented and that I did
receive feedback on my papers throughout the process. My guess is that they
used an analytical method for evaluation. The reason I believe that is when I
assign papers to write in social studies classes I normally use an analytical
method as a rubric. Honestly I don’t remember where I learned to use the
method, but I think it was from past English classes. I believe that the
procedures were explicit and appropriate because I don’t remember ever being
frustrated about the way in which teachers graded my writing assignments.
I believe
the scores and feedback I have received over the years has really helped
improve my writing. Normally I am very open to feedback and feedback in terms
of my grade. That is a great chance to learn and improve upon my mistakes. When
a teacher suggests something I really listen and try to do what the teachers
suggests. In the book it talks about how sometimes students can be too reliant
on teachers and the writing piece largely is the teachers work. I have been
reflecting on that possibility, and hopefully that has not been the case. As
teachers I assume we all have those students who try and ask for help on every
question. That was definitely not me since I was somewhat timid, and I don’t
recall any teacher having to consistently help me so I don’t think any teacher
inhibited my writing ability. Overall I felt comfortable writing in English
since it is my native language, but I definitely did not feel comfortable
writing in Spanish. I really craved the evaluation and feedback on my Spanish
writing assignments because I was desperate to get better.
The primary
experience I have in grading writing assignments is in my social studies
courses and Spanish courses. I graduated from a liberal Arts University that
really stressed how disciplines are interdependent so I have tried to
incorporate that mentality in my teaching methods. For instance, I try and help
the English department by stressing the importance of writing. Often times I
will have a rubric for a writing assignment and I will assign a grading
percentage for content, organization, and spelling. Since it is a social
studies class I normally only count off about 5% for spelling, but I at least
try and emphasize it a little. When grading these assignments I believe the
toughest challenge is being consistent. I think that inconsistency primarily
comes from getting tired while grading writing papers. If I allow myself to get
too tired I find myself not correcting as much, being as strict, or being
focused when grading. Often times I will realize my fatigue and take a break,
but when you are behind which can often times be the case, I just have to push
through. One other worry I have about grading is being biased towards certain
writing styles or those students who do not write similar to me. My wife and I
will often times proofread each other’s papers for assignments, but we have
totally different writing styles. I can’t count the times that we have told
each other “I wouldn’t word it that way”. Sometimes I wonder if I count off
more on papers for those who just have different writing styles than mine.
Formal
assessment is a very important tool in evaluating students and helping them see
where improvement is needed. It is a very difficult task when assessing
writing. Unlike judging whether or not a student learns vocabulary terms for a
quiz, assessing writing can be very judgment based. Formal assessment does not
have to critique every aspect of writing every time but I think it is
beneficial to assess many different areas of writing at some point. For
instance, students can learn and become better writers by learning from grammar
mistakes, spelling mistakes, improper organization, and lack of content
knowledge. Making lower grades than hoped can create an incentive for students
to improve in areas that they are lacking. There are many motivating factors
for students, but often time’s grades can be the biggest motivator.
Portfolios
are definitely something I am familiar with. If you are in an education program
in Oklahoma teachers must create a portfolio. I assume it is the same way in
Texas. We were told that principals would look at our portfolios and make
hiring decisions partly based off them, and that was true for some new
teachers. No principal ever asked or wanted mine. That was somewhat
disappointing because I felt like all that work was wasted. After reflecting
back on the experience, I think creating the portfolio made me a better
teacher. I learned a great deal from creating the portfolio. It allowed me to
come up with my teaching philosophy, reflections on how to plan for classes, my
behavior management philosophy, reflect on ways to evaluate, and so forth. I
can look back at it today and see how my philosophies have changed after having
experience in the classroom. I can determine if I think my philosophies were
ineffective or maybe determine that I have gotten away from a philosophy but it
still might be effective.